Court held that it was not required to consider expert testimony of whether a bond existed between mother and child before terminating parental rights, as it had considered that issue with the evidence presented and had found no such relationship.\u00a0 Adoption of JMSB<\/i>, 3 Fid. Rep. 3d 354 (O.C. Chester) (Sacavage, J.)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Court held that it was not required to consider expert testimony of whether a bond existed between mother and child before terminating parental rights, as it had considered that issue with the evidence presented and had found no such relationship.\u00a0 … Continue reading