{"id":1642,"date":"2012-09-01T15:16:20","date_gmt":"2012-09-01T19:16:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/resources.evans-legal.com\/?p=1642"},"modified":"2015-03-17T15:07:47","modified_gmt":"2015-03-17T19:07:47","slug":"griggs-estate-1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/resources.evans-legal.com\/?p=1642","title":{"rendered":"Standing and Discovery in Will Contest"},"content":{"rendered":"<p align=\"LEFT\">Issues before the Court in appeal from probate of will contest: (1) does trustee have standing; (2) does subpoena requesting decedent&#8217;s legal files violate attorney-client privilege and how should privilege be claimed per document; and (3) were the subpoenas for emails of decedent over 4 years overly broad. The court held that: (1) the trustee had standing as an aggrieved party, because the will contest affected beneficiaries of the trust and the trustee was a fiduciary of the beneficiaries; (2) the executor held the attorney-client privilege and a log should be created with sufficient information for each matter claimed as privileged; and (3) the subpoenas for email discovery were overly broad and needed to be narrowly tailored.\u00a0 <i>Griggs Estate (No. 1)<\/i>, 2 Fid. Rep. 3d 346 (O.C. Chester 2012) (Opinion by Tunnell, J.)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Issues before the Court in appeal from probate of will contest: (1) does trustee have standing; (2) does subpoena requesting decedent&#8217;s legal files violate attorney-client privilege and how should privilege be claimed per document; and (3) were the subpoenas for &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/resources.evans-legal.com\/?p=1642\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[34],"tags":[153,152,177,156,76],"class_list":["post-1642","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-opinions","tag-attorneyclient-privilege","tag-discovery","tag-discovery-overbroad","tag-standing","tag-will-contest","pmpro-has-access"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/resources.evans-legal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1642","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/resources.evans-legal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/resources.evans-legal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/resources.evans-legal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/resources.evans-legal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1642"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/resources.evans-legal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1642\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2111,"href":"https:\/\/resources.evans-legal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1642\/revisions\/2111"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/resources.evans-legal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1642"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/resources.evans-legal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1642"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/resources.evans-legal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1642"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}