{"id":5920,"date":"2018-05-23T11:07:22","date_gmt":"2018-05-23T15:07:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/resources.evans-legal.com\/?p=5920"},"modified":"2018-05-23T11:07:22","modified_gmt":"2018-05-23T15:07:22","slug":"intervention-and-consolidation-for-related-trusts","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/resources.evans-legal.com\/?p=5920","title":{"rendered":"Intervention and Consolidation for Related Trusts"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Son was allowed to intervene in litigation which his deceased father had begun over the validity of a trust allegedly created by the father, even though the son&#8217;s interests as a beneficiary under his father&#8217;s will were protected by the administrator of his father&#8217;s estate, when there was also a dispute about whether assets of his mother&#8217;s trust had been improperly transferred to his father&#8217;s trust.\u00a0 Because of the overlap of factual issues between the two trusts, the trials over the father&#8217;s trust and mother&#8217;s trust were consolidated.\u00a0 Summary judgment on the issue of the validity of the father&#8217;s trust was denied because of factual issues surrounding the alleged execution of the trust, and summary judgment was also denied on whether the property transferred to the father&#8217;s trust would revert to joint tenancy with the daughter if the trust were found to be voidable.\u00a0\u00a0<em>Altemose Trusts<\/em>, 8 Fid.Rep.3d 119 (Monroe Co. O.C. 2018).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Son was allowed to intervene in litigation which his deceased father had begun over the validity of a trust allegedly created by the father, even though the son&#8217;s interests as a beneficiary under his father&#8217;s will were protected by the &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/resources.evans-legal.com\/?p=5920\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[34],"tags":[679,677,496,297,678,317],"class_list":["post-5920","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-opinions","tag-agents-powers","tag-consolidation","tag-intervention","tag-joint-tenancy","tag-trust-creation","tag-trust-reformation","pmpro-has-access"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/resources.evans-legal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5920","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/resources.evans-legal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/resources.evans-legal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/resources.evans-legal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/resources.evans-legal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=5920"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/resources.evans-legal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5920\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5922,"href":"https:\/\/resources.evans-legal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5920\/revisions\/5922"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/resources.evans-legal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=5920"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/resources.evans-legal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=5920"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/resources.evans-legal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=5920"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}