{"id":7262,"date":"2019-10-27T12:20:56","date_gmt":"2019-10-27T16:20:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/resources.evans-legal.com\/?p=7262"},"modified":"2019-10-27T12:22:55","modified_gmt":"2019-10-27T16:22:55","slug":"civil-division-lacks-jurisdiction-over-validity-of-will-and-claim-for-specific-performance","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/resources.evans-legal.com\/?p=7262","title":{"rendered":"Civil Division Lacks Jurisdiction over Validity of Will and Claim for Specific Performance"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Civil complaint that &#8220;touches on&#8221; validity of decedent&#8217;s will was dismissed with prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and not transferred to Orphans&#8217; Court division.  <em>Kramer, III v. Mary T. Kramer Estate (No. 1)<\/em>, 9 Fid.Rep.3d 272 (Lycoming C.P. 2019).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Upon reconsideration, the court transferred to the Orphans&#8217; Court division the claim for specific performance of an alleged contract of the decedent to sell real property, which is under the mandatory jurisdiction of the Orphans&#8217; Court under 20 Pa.C.S. \u00a7 711(13) and (17).   <em>Kramer, III v. Mary T. Kramer Estate (No. 2)<\/em>, 9 Fid.Rep.3d 273 (Lycoming C.P. 2019) <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Civil complaint that &#8220;touches on&#8221; validity of decedent&#8217;s will was dismissed with prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and not transferred to Orphans&#8217; Court division. Kramer, III v. Mary T. Kramer Estate (No. 1), 9 Fid.Rep.3d 272 (Lycoming C.P. &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/resources.evans-legal.com\/?p=7262\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[34],"tags":[210,170],"class_list":["post-7262","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-opinions","tag-jurisdiction","tag-specific-performance","pmpro-has-access"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/resources.evans-legal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7262","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/resources.evans-legal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/resources.evans-legal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/resources.evans-legal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/resources.evans-legal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=7262"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/resources.evans-legal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7262\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7263,"href":"https:\/\/resources.evans-legal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7262\/revisions\/7263"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/resources.evans-legal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=7262"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/resources.evans-legal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=7262"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/resources.evans-legal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=7262"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}