{"id":8742,"date":"2021-08-08T08:33:07","date_gmt":"2021-08-08T12:33:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/resources.evans-legal.com\/?p=8742"},"modified":"2021-08-08T08:33:08","modified_gmt":"2021-08-08T12:33:08","slug":"gift-was-result-of-undue-influence","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/resources.evans-legal.com\/?p=8742","title":{"rendered":"Gift Was Result of Undue Influence"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>There was evidence of donative intent by the decedent to give her former son-in-law $500,000, but not $1,000,000, so the transfer of $1,000,000 by the decedent was a partial gift, but the gift was invalid because of the presumption of undue influence by the son-in-law who was also the decedent&#8217;s agent and caretaker.  The additional $500,000 was obtained for promises made by the son-in-law to take care of the decedent, which he did not do and so was unjustly enriched.  <em>In re: Barbara D. Dotter<\/em>, 11 Fid.Rep.3d 107 (Allegheny O.C. 2019).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>There was evidence of donative intent by the decedent to give her former son-in-law $500,000, but not $1,000,000, so the transfer of $1,000,000 by the decedent was a partial gift, but the gift was invalid because of the presumption of &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/resources.evans-legal.com\/?p=8742\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[34],"tags":[460,75,620],"class_list":["post-8742","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-opinions","tag-donative-intent","tag-undue-influence","tag-unjust-enrichment","pmpro-has-access"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/resources.evans-legal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8742","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/resources.evans-legal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/resources.evans-legal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/resources.evans-legal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/resources.evans-legal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=8742"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/resources.evans-legal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8742\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8743,"href":"https:\/\/resources.evans-legal.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8742\/revisions\/8743"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/resources.evans-legal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=8742"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/resources.evans-legal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=8742"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/resources.evans-legal.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=8742"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}