The Superior Court had previously held that the decedent’s revocable trust was ambiguous and had remanded the case for the consideration of extrinsic evidence of the decedent’s intent, and so reversed the Orphans’ Court when it disregarded the evidence that was presented and again ruled in favor of the decedent’s nephew and against the decedent’s niece, finding that the Orphans’ Court disregarded the “law of the case” and that its decision was unsupported by the record. The Superior Court found that the prior wills of the decedent had been for the benefit of the niece, and that those wills, together with credible testimony of a statement by the decedent shortly before his death that he intended to benefit his niece, confirmed that the ambiguity in the revocable trust should be resolved in favor of the niece. In re: Donald Bany Revocable Living Trust, 1276 MDA 2023 (Pa. Super. 12/17/2025) (non-precedential).