The Orphans’ Court properly found that the alleged incapacitated person (“AIP”) was incapacitated and in need of guardianship services, notwithstanding the testimony of the AIP to the contrary, based on medical testimony that the AIP had impaired short-term memory, so that he lacked the ability to make medical, self-care, and financial decisions, as well as the court’s own observations of the AIP and his difficulty in recalling events and in responding to his own counsel’s questions. The evidence also supported the decision of the Orphans’ Court not to direct that the AIP be returned to his home under the care of a guardian as a less restrictive alternative. In re: Person and Estate of J.P.D., 987 EDA 2025 (Pa. Super. 12/30/2025) (non-precedential).