A trial court always has the power to reconsider its own decisions, without any requirement of manifest error or new evidence, and it was particularly appropriate for the Orphans’ Court to reconsider its order appointing an administrator of an estate when there had been multiple petitions requesting appointment for different administrators and the appointment was made in response to an amended petition without notice to any other party in interest. Because the register of wills had certified the appointment of the administrator to the Orphans’ Court, the court had the same discretion as the register to appoint “any fit person” to serve as administrator when there was no one with greater priority in the order of persons eligible for appointment. It was not an abuse of discretion for the court to appoint a lawyer experienced in estate administration, and who was preferred by the mothers of the two minor heirs, as administrator over the decedent’s mother, who was not an intestate heir, had health issues, did not have a personal relationship with the decedent’s minor sons, and expected to claim a commission of 5% in addition to legal fees and other costs, because the mother’s family relationship to the decedent did not give her any preference or priority. Estate of Trever Glen Staten, ___ A.4th ___, 2026 PA Super 227 (10/8/2026).