Decedent with multiple residences was found to be domiciled in Pennsylvania, as all of his mail came to his Philadelphia residence and he wished to return there; undue influence was not proved by either direct or indirect evidence, as the decedent was a strong willed individual with much business experience; and fraud, insane delusion, forgery, and lack of testamentary capacity lacked supporting evidence in will contest.  Rothberg Estate, 4 Fid. Rep. 3d 403 (O.C. Phila. 2014) (Opinion by O’Keefe, Admin. J.), aff’d, Nos. 2391 EDA 2014 and 2795 EDA 2014 (Pa. Super. 6/26/2015) (non-precedential).