The Orphans’ Court Procedural Rules Committee has published proposed new rules for guardianship proceedings, Pa.O.C. Rules 14.1 to 14.14, and new Orphans’ Court Forms G-01 through G-06. These new proposed rules are revisions to the rules that were proposed in … Continue reading
Tag Archives: Guardianship
Adams County has adopted new Orphans’ Court local rules for Chapter 14 (Guardianship of Incapacitated Persons), Chapter 15 (Adoptions) and Chapter 16 (Abortion Control Act), all to be effective 30 days after publication in the Pennsylvania Bulletin, and has amended … Continue reading
The Orphans’ Court Procedural Rules Committee has released a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking with new proposed rules for guardianship proceedings. “Proposed Amendment of Pa. O.C. Rule 1.5, Proposed Rescission of Pa. O.C. Rules 14.1—14.5 and Orphans’ Court Forms G-01—G-04, Proposed … Continue reading
The Orphans’ Court Procedural Rules Committee has proposed a new O.C. Rule 14.6, and a new form, relating to written depositions in guardianship proceedings. As the committee report explains, expert testimony in guardianship proceedings is authorized by statute, 20 Pa.C.S. … Continue reading
Previously overlooked: The report of the Supreme Court’s Elder Law Task Force was released in November 2014. The press release announcing the report, titled “Elder Law Task Force delivers report with recommendations to aid Supreme Court in protecting elders from … Continue reading
An individual adjudicated incapacitated with a mechanical pump in her heart was refusing medical treatment, psychological treatment, and medication, and she has religious delusions; the Court held a review hearing and opined that the guardian of the person had full … Continue reading
Guardian of estate of incapacitated person, who had previously been granted the power to pay nursing home costs from principal and who had been authorized to sell real estate, did not have power to consent to judgments against the ward; … Continue reading
Court denied petition of guardian for sale of 43 acres after son opposed sale, because (i) the Court already approved sale of second property with house and (ii) the 43 acres includes a cellphone tower lease for $1300 per month … Continue reading