Objection to notice of intention to serve subpoenas on medical providers was denied even though the subpoenas covered time periods not relevant to whether the decedent had testamentary capacity, but a motion for a protective order was granted and the use of the subpoened material was limited to the current proceeding and directed to be destroyed at the conclusion of the proceeding. Although some procedural errors were disregarded, relief requested as a part of a “new matter” was denied without prejudice to seek the relief by a proper motion or petition. Palla Estate, 3 Fid.Rep.4th 278 (Northampton O.C. 2024).