The Orphans’ Court abused its discretion and erred as a matter of law when it disregarded the testimony of two expert witnesses that the person previously adjudicated to be incapacitated was no longer incapacitated, and relied solely on evidence of past financial irresponsibility, in refusing to terminate the guardianship as requested by the incapacitated person because the proponent of the guardianship did not meet the burden of clear and convincing evidence of continuing incapacity. In re: M.E., an Incapacitated Person, ___ A.4th ___, 2026 PA Super 30.