The testimony of two doctors supported the conclusion of the Orphans’ Court that the decedent lacked testamentary capacity when she signed a will in 2012, and it was within the discretion of the court to place more weight on that evidence than the testimony of the lawyer who wrote the will. In her appeal from the probate of the will signed in 2008, the appellant alleged the existence of a 2012 will but not a 2010 will, so the existence of the 2010 will was not raised within one year of the probate of the 2008 will and the revocation of the 2008 will by the 2010 will was waived. Because the 2012 will was found to be invalid, the probate of the 2008 will was affirmed. Finally, the record supported the conclusion of the Orphans’ Court that the petition to probate the 2008 will was not a fraud on the court because the proponent of the 2008 will had no direct knowledge of the 2010 and 2012 will, and credibly believed that the later wills were invalid. In re: Estate of Naomi R. Cherup, 480 WDA 2025 (Pa. Super. 6/30/2026) (non-precedential).