It was not an abuse of discretion for the Orphans’ Court to appoint the alleged incapacitated person’s granddaughter as his guardian, rather than the AIP’s nephew, when the nephew had a closer relationship with the AIP’s daughter (who had proposed the nephew as guardian and appealed the appointment of the granddaughter) than with other family members and there was videotape evidence (and pending criminal charges) of the daughter’s involvement in the abuse of the AIP by her husband. In re: Estate of Harold M. Mathias, an Alleged Incapacitated Person, 1141 WDA 2025 (Pa. Super. 9/16/2026) (non-precedential).