An appeal from an order of the Orphans’ Court granting in part and denying in part a motion for reconsideration was quashed even though the issues for which reconsideration was denied were appealable because the motion for reconsideration did not extend the time limit for appeal, while the grant of reconsideration is not appealable because it is not a final order with respect to the issues addressed by that order. In re: Estate of Erich A. Hooper, 1183 MDA 2022 (Pa. Super. 9/8/2023) (non-precedential).

The opinions that were the subjects of the above appeal were published as Hooper Estate (No. 1), 1 Fid.Rep.4th 208 (Susquehanna O.C. 2022), and Hooper Estate (No. 2), 1 Fid.Rep.4th 216 (Susquehanna O.C. 2022). See “Distribution of Royalties under Will after Disclaimer and with Ineffective Residuary Clause.“