Tips for Easier Drafting from Forms

The forms in use in a firm should be easy to edit, and it should be easy to copy and paste language from one document to another, so lawyers responsible for creating or maintaining will and trust (and other estate planning) forms should try to make the pieces of the wills and trusts as interchangeable as possible. Making the language, structure, and format of documents consistent will make it easier for lawyers, paralegals, and secretaries (or a computerized drafting system) to assemble different pieces into a coherent document.

Here are some suggestions for easier document drafting:

  1. Write revocable and irrevocable trusts in the first person (the settlor or grantor being “I”) rather than using third-person references to “the settlor” or “the grantor.” In that way, the same language can be used for similar provisions of both wills and trusts, such as trusts for the children of the settlor/testator.
  2. Adopt standard document formatting for all forms of wills, trusts, and other estate planning forms. Maintaining similar styles for paragraph numbering, paragraph headers, page numbering, acknowledgments, jurats, signature lines, and other mechanical parts of the document will greatly simplify the design and the maintenance of forms, as well as cutting-and-pasting between forms.
  3. Eliminate differences in number and gender whenever possible. Consider these possible changes.
    • Use “executors” (or “trustees” or “agents”) regardless of whether two fiduciaries are named to serve together initially, or only one fiduciary is named initially and others are named as successors. As long as possible successors exist, and the provisions of the document apply to both the initial appointees and the successors, references to “the executors” or “the trustees” can refer to all of the fiduciaries who might serve, will be grammatically and semantically correct, and will greatly simplify the choices in drafting and modifying the documents for different factual situations. For example, by using “executors” consistently, you can regularly use “they” and “their,” as well as plural forms of verbs, without needing to make changes throughout a document based on the number of fiduciaries initially named.
    • Use gender-neutral terms, such as “child” or beneficiary,” to refer to the beneficiaries of a trust, instead of “son” or “daughter.” (However, do not use “spouse” instead of “husband” or “wife.”) (Question:  What term should be used to apply to the spouse when the spouses are the same sex?  Should the will of a man who is married to a man refer to the spouse as a “husband,” “partner,” or “spouse”?)
    • Eliminate personal pronouns wherever possible, substituting possessive forms when needed. For example, if trust provisions always refer to “the child” and “the child’s” (instead of “his or her”), there is no need to worry about what to do when the client has four daughters and no sons. Similarly, use possessives to refer to the spouse, instead of “his or her.” If done correctly, the substitution of “husband” or “wife” for “spouse” will also change “my spouse’s income” to “my wife’s income” or “my husband’s income.”
    • Use “testator” and “executor” to refer to both men and women. The Latin feminine forms (“testatrix” and “executrix”) are archaic and rarely are seen outside of clumsy documents written by lawyers who are scared to change anything found in a form book. Statutes are almost always gender-neutral, and even judges rarely use the feminine Latin forms.

Mandatory Counsel for Children in Involuntary Termination of Parental Rights

The Supreme Court has held that 23 Pa.C.S. § 2313(a), which requires the appointment of counsel for children involved in contested involuntary termination of parental rights, is not satisfied by the appointment of a guardian ad litem who is also an attorney, because the guardian ad litem is required to consider the best interests of the children as well as the legal interests of the children.  In Re: Adoption of L.B.M., No 84 MAP 2016 (Pa. 3/28/2017), rev’g No. 1834 MDA 2015 (Pa. Super. 5/31/2016).

0% Inheritance Tax Rate for Minors?

Somewhat to my surprise, a  bill in the Pennsylvania legislature that would reduce the inheritance tax to 0% for transfers to children under the age of 21 (HB 291) has made it out of committee and received its first consideration.

This same bill was introduced in the last session and went nowhere, and seems to have been inspired by a change in 2000 that imposed a 0% tax rate on transfers from minor children to parents.

Leaving aside the weirdness of imposing different taxes on children who are 18 and children who are 22, the measure would also introduce some complexity in the calculations when the residue of an estate goes to children and some are under 21 and some are not.  Like the situation when a charity receives a fraction of the after-tax residue, the tax calculation will become inter-related (or circular) in most cases.

I’m not going to worry about it too much because it hasn’t passed yet (and I hope it doesn’t).

Guardianship, Adoptions, and Abortion Control Rules for Adams County

Adams County has adopted new Orphans’ Court local rules for Chapter 14 (Guardianship of Incapacitated Persons), Chapter 15 (Adoptions) and Chapter 16 (Abortion Control Act), all to be effective 30 days after publication in the Pennsylvania Bulletin, and has amended new Rule 15.6.  “Orphans’ Court Rules; Administrative Order No. 7 of 2017,” (2/2/2017), 47 Pa.B. 1628 (3/18/2017); “Orphans’ Court Rules; Administrative Order No. 7A of 2017,” (3/1/2017), 47 Pa.B. 1630 (3/18/2017).

Applicable Federal Rates Edge Upwards

The various applicable federal rates (AFRs) published by the Internal Revenue Service, which are used to value life estates, remainders, annuities, and other future interests, as well as intra-family loans, continue to edge upwards.

The new section 7520 rate for April, 2.6%, is the highest since June of 2011, which is almost six years.

See the complete table of 7520 rates and the AFRs for 2017.

Non-Litigating Heir Cannot Challenge Settlement

An intestate heir who does not join in an appeal from the probate of a will has no standing to challenge a settlement agreement between the beneficiary under the will and the other intestate heirs which left the probate of the will intact and required the beneficiary to make payments to the intestate heirs who had appealed from probate.   Ballinger Estate, 7 Fid.Rep.3d 53, No. 545 AP of 2013 (O.C. Philadelphia Co. 11/9/2016), aff’d, 2620 EDA 2016 (Pa. Super. 5/19/2017) (non-precedential)..