The Orphans’ Court found the witnesses in support of the authenticity of the will to be credible, and did not find the petitioner’s allegations of forgery to be credible. The signatures in the margins of the pages of the will were not relevant because all parties agreed that the signature at the end of the will was the decedent’s. There was also clear and convincing evidence (including videographic evidence) that the petitioner understood the disclaimer he signed and intended to disclaim his interest in the estate, so that he no longer had standing to compel the filing of an account by the executor. Harm Estate (No. 1), 3 Fid.Rep.4th 81 (Bucks O.C. 2024) (memorandum opinion); Harm Estate (No. 2), 3 Fid.Rep.4th 87 (Bucks O.C. 2024) (Pa.R.A.P. 1925 opinion), aff’d, 1702 EDA 2024 (Pa. Super. 1/14/2025) (non-precedential) (see “Meritless Appeal of Denial of Forgery Claim“).