It was not an abuse of discretion or error of law for the Orphans’ Court to continue the appointment of a plenary guardian for the incapacitated person when there was uncontradicted testimony at the review hearing that the incapacitated person was in need of “24/7 care and support” and had no family or friends able to provide that care. In re: M.W., an Alleged Incapacitated Person, 1721 MDA 2024 (Pa. Super. 7/18/2025) (non-precedential).