It was not an abuse of discretion for the Orphans’ Court to deny two post-hearing motions that sought to add documents to the record, and to request a new evaluation of the incapacitated person, when the issues being addressed by the motions were known before the hearing and further delays were not in the best interests of the incapacitated person. Other issues were found to be waived or without merit, and the Superior Court refused to rely on a non-precedential decision issued before May 1, 2019, the effective date of Pa. R.A.P. 126(b) which allows reliance on persuasive non-precedential opinion. In re: Cody Zedak, and Incapacitated Person, 112 WDA 2025 (Pa. Super. 10/23/2025).