Missing Income Tax Returns of a Decedent

One of the duties of the executor or administrator of an estate is to file required income tax returns for the decedent. I.R.C. § 6012(b)(1) states that the federal income tax return that is required for a decedent shall be…

This content is for Subscriber members only.
Register
Already a member? Log in here

Federal COVID Payments Not PA Income

The Act of February 5, 2021 (No. 1 of 2021), S.B. 109, provides that

  • The forgiveness of paycheck protection program (“PPP”) loans that is not income for federal income tax purposes under the Tax Relief Act of 2020 (Subtitle B of Title II of Division N of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021, P.L. 115-260) is also not income for PA income tax purposes. However, expenses paid with those loans are not deductible if the loans are forgiven.
  • Economic impact payments under the CARES act are also not income to individuals for PA income tax purposes.

Section 104-A of the Act of April 9, 1929 (No. 176), known as the Fiscal Code, as amended by Section 1.1 of Act 1 of 2021.

No Undue Influence or Unjust Enrichment in Execution of Deed

In an action to set aside a deed allegedly obtained by undue influence, plaintiff’s testimony that she and the defendant were friends and she trusted him, and that she was “weak in bode and mind” following the death of her husband five years before, was not sufficient to establish a confidential relationship or weakened intellect and summary judgment for the defendant was granted. A claim for unjust enrichment was denied because the four year statute of limitations had run, and because the evidence showed that the plaintiff had intended to benefit the defendant so the enrichment was not unjust. Stackhouse v. Gordner, 10 Fid.Rep.3d 330 (Lycoming C.P. 2020).

Co-Administrator Has Action Against Agent

One of two co-administrators of an estate has the power to compel an accounting by an agent for the decedent without the consent of the other co-administrator. An action in the Orphans’ Court to recover assets transferred by an agent is equitable and not barred by any statute of limitations, but only by a defense of laches, and the party asserting laches must show that there was prejudice caused by any delay in the filing of the petition. Mahlstadt Estate. No. 2, 10 Fid.Rep.3d 323 (Monroe O.C. 2020).

Fraudulent Inducement Requires Clear and Convincing Evidence

The Pa. Supreme Court has held that the voiding of a trust by a settlor alleging fraud in the inducement requires clear and convincing evidence of common law fraud, the elements of which are a knowing or reckless material misrepresentation, an intention to mislead another into reliance, and resulting injury caused by justifiable reliance. Evidence of the failure of the settlor’s husband to disclose the identity of real property held by entities transferred to the trust was insufficient because it was not a material misrepresentation. In re: Passarelli Family Trust, ___ A.3d ___, 71 MAP 2019 (Pa. 12/22/2020), aff’ng 206 A.3d 1188, 2019 PA Super 95 (2019) (en banc), rev’g 7 Fid.Rep.3d 63 (O.C. Chester Co. 2016).

“Physical Presence” Waiver Extended for Retirement Plan Consents

The Internal Revenue Service has extended until June 30, 2021, the waiver of the physical presence requirement for retirement plan consents that was first announced in Notice 2020-422020-26 I.R.B. 986 (6/22/2020). Notice 2021-03, 2021-02 I.R.B. ___ (1/11/2021).

This latest notice includes a request for comments, in particular on whether the waiver of the physical presence requirement should be made permanent.

Applicable Federal Rates for 2020

← Previous Year | Current Year | Following Year →

HTML Version Copyright 2018-2025 Daniel B. Evans. All rights reserved.

— Short Term Rates for 2020 —

MonthAnnualSemiann.QuarterlyMonthly
Jan.1.60%1.59%1.59%1.58%
Feb.1.59%1.58%1.58%1.57%
March1.50%1.49%1.49%1.49%
April0.91%0.91%0.91%0.91%
May0.25%0.25%0.25%0.25%
June0.18%0.18%0.18%0.18%
July0.18%0.18%0.18%0.18%
Aug.0.17%0.17%0.17%0.17%
Sept.0.14%0.14%0.14%0.14%
Oct.0.14%0.14%0.14%0.14%
Nov.0.13%0.13%0.13%0.13%
Dec.0.15%0.15%0.15%0.15%

— Mid Term Rates for 2020 —

MonthAnnualSemiann.QuarterlyMonthly
Jan.1.69%1.68%1.68%1.67%
Feb.1.75%1.74%1.74%1.73%
March1.53%1.52%1.52%1.52%
April0.99%0.99%0.99%0.99%
May0.58%0.58%0.58%0.58%
June0.43%0.43%0.43%0.43%
July0.45%0.45%0.45%0.45%
Aug.0.41%0.41%0.41%0.41%
Sept.0.35%0.35%0.35%0.35%
Oct.0.38%0.38%0.38%0.38%
Nov.0.39%0.39%0.39%0.39%
Dec.0.48%0.48%0.48%0.48%

 — Long Term Rates for 2020 —

MonthAnnualSemiann.QuarterlyMonthly
Jan.2.07%2.06%2.05%2.05%
Feb.2.15%2.14%2.13%2.13%
March1.93%1.92%1.92%1.91%
April1.44%1.43%1.43%1.43%
May1.15%1.15%1.15%1.15%
June1.01%1.01%1.01%1.01%
July1.17%1.17%1.17%1.17%
Aug.1.12%1.12%1.12%1.12%
Sept.1.00%1.00%1.00%1.00%
Oct.1.12%1.12%1.12%1.12%
Nov.1.17%1.17%1.17%1.17%
Dec.1.31%1.31%1.31%1.31%

Supreme Court to Hear Standing Dispute

The Supreme Court has allowed an appeal from the Superior Court decision in Trust under Will of Augustus T. Ashton, 203 EAL 2020 (12/2/2020). The order states the issue to be:

Did the Superior Court err when it held that the equitable property interest in the trust res of a current vested beneficiary does not establish the beneficiary’s automatic standing to raise issues with the Trustees’ breach of fiduciary duties to the Trust, but instead a court must evaluate each and every beneficiary’s individualized financial loss to determine if it meets some unknown threshold sufficient to meet the “substantial, direct and immediate” test?

Going forward, the docket number in the Supreme Court will be 36 EAP 2020.

As previously reported, the beneficiary in question is entitled to an annuity of $2,400 each year for life from the trust. The Superior Court held that the beneficiary did not have have a “direct, immediate and substantial” interest in transactions reported in the trustee’s account covering a period during which the trust fund increased from about $5.56 million to about $73 million and so did not have standing to object to those transactions or to petition for the appointment of a co-trustee, but did have standing to object to the division of the trust into separate trusts, only one of which would be used to pay the annuity. Trust under Will of Augustus T. Ashton, Deceased, Dated January 20, 19502020 PA Super 130 (6/3/2020), rev’g No. 1039 ST of 1952 (Philadelphia O.C. 2/25/2019).

Update: On 10/4/2021, the Supreme Court issued an opinion reversing the Superior Court in part. Trust under Will of Augustus T. Ashton, Deceased, Dated January 20, 1950, ___ Pa. ___, ___ A.3d ___, 36 EAP 2020 (Pa. 10/4/2021), (with concurrence by Wecht, J.).

New Luzerne County Fee Schedule

Luzerne County has published a new fee schedule for the Register of Wills and Clerk of the Orphans’ Court, to be effective January 1, 2021. “Request to Increase Fees of that Section of the Division of Judicial Services and Records, Formerly Referred to as the Office of the Register of Wills/Clerk of Orphans Court; No. 10345 of 2020” (11/10/2020), 50 Pa.B. 7018 (12/12/2020).