The beneficiaries of certificates of deposits which were originally alleged to be “in trust for” accounts, and which had been held to give them standing to challenge actions of decedent’s agents who removed the beneficiary designations before the decedent’s death, continued to have standing even though the accounts were later found to be joint accounts, because both types of accounts are testamentary in nature and the beneficiaries had the same interest in litigating the breach of fiduciary duty by the agents acting under a durable power of attorney.  Rellick v. Rellick-Smith, 630 WDA 2022 (Pa. Super. 5/17/2023) (non-precedential). (For an earlier opinion in this case, first addressing the issue of standing, see Rellick v. Rellick-Smith, 147 A.3d 897, 2016 PA Super 184 (Pa.Super. 8/22/2016).)