The decision of the Register of Wills to deny letters of administration to the father of the minor decedent, and grant letters to the mother instead, was affirmed because the father had filed a petition for letters in Beaver County and falsely stated that the minor was a resident in that county even though it was undisputed that the minor had actually resided with her mother in Allegheny County, as shown on the death certificate. Gennaro Estate, 1 Fid.Rep.4th 25 (Allegheny O.C. 2022), aff’d 758 WDA 2022 (PA Super. 2/9/2023).
A limited guardian of the person and limited guardian of the estate was appointed due to problems with alcoholism and nutrition, leading to repeated hospital admissions for dehydration and malnutrition, the court finding partial incapacity based on expert testimony that the alleged incapacitated person suffers from mild neurocognitive disorder from alcohol abuse and was at risk of financial exploitation. In Re: P.O., An Incapacitated Person, 1 Fid.Rep.4th 5 (Montgomery O.C. 2021), aff’d, 1587 EDA 2021 (PA Super. 7/15/2022) (non-precedential).
An adopted child was a member of a current beneficiary’s “immediate family” and therefore eligible to receive discretionary principal distributions even though distributions of principal upon the death of the beneficiary are limited to members of the settlor’s “blood line” and excludes adopted persons. Bristol Trust, 1 Fid.Rep.4th 1 (Philadelphia O.C. 2023).
The Orphans’ Court correctly concluded that the rent payable by a beneficiary to the estate under a family settlement agreement should be divided among all of the beneficiaries, including the beneficiary paying the rent, but incorrectly calculated the net rent owed by the beneficiary and the net estate estate distributable. Estate of Geraldine M. Price, 1501 EDA 2022 (Pa. Super. 4/5/2023) (non-precedential).
In Rev. Rul. 2023-2, ___ I.R.B. ___, the Internal Revenue Service has held that assets held in an irrevocable trust that was a grantor trust do not receive a new basis under I.R.C. § 1014 on the death of the grantor if the assets are not included in the grantor’s gross estate for federal estate tax purposes.
[For a brief explanation of grantor trusts, see “Overview: Benefits/Costs of Grantor Trusts.”]
In an ejectment action brought by the administrator of an estate, the heirs of the decedent were not indispensible parties even though title to the property had passed to the heirs at the death of the decedent under 20 Pa.C.S. § 301(b), but the decree of the Orphans’ Court was vacated and remanded because the administrator had failed to introduce any proof that the decedent had owned the property at death. In re: Estate of Vernell Smith, 378 EDA 2022 (Super. 3/24/2023) (non-precedential).
Westmoreland County has adopted a new local form of report for adoption intermediaries. “Order Adopting New Form for Report of Intermediary; No. 3 of 2023” (3/14/2023), 53 Pa.B. 1665 (3/25/2023).
The discovery of a later will may be the subject of an appeal to the Orphans’ Court within one year of the probate of the earlier will even though the appeal is after the end of the three month period within which the Register may admit the later will to probate under 20 Pa.C.S. § 3138. In re: Estate of Kathryn V. Ruhlman, 2023 PA Super 43, ___ A.3d ___ (3/15/2023).
Philadelphia has adopted new local Orphans’ Court Rules 3.5A (“Procedure for Determination when No Response is Filed to a Petition under Pa.R.O.C.P. 3.5(a) or 3.5(b)”) and 5.50A (“Settlement of Small Estates by Petition”), and has amended and restated Rule 14.2A (“Petition for Adjudication of Incapacity and Appointment of a Guardian of the Person or Estate of an Incapacitated Person). “Adoption of Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas Orphans’ Court Rules 3.5A, 5.50A and 14.2A; President Judge General Court Regulation; No. 3 of 2023” (2/15/2023), 53 Pa.B. 1169 (3/4/2023).
It was not an abuse of discretion or an error of law for the Orphans’ Court to allow a late spousal election under 20 Pa.C.S. § 2210 by the guardian of an incapacitated spouse when the COVID-19 pandemic struck between the date of death and the six month filing deadline, the estate was not harmed by the delay, all parties were aware that the guardian intended to make the election, and inequities and gross injustice would otherwise result. In re: Estate of Terri Garbutt, 616 EDA 2022 (Pa. Super. 2/27/2023) (non-precedential), aff’g Garbutt Estate, 1 Fid.Rep.4th 29 (Chester O.C. 2022). [Updated on 6/5/2023 to add citation to the O.C. opinion.]