Agent Surcharged for Lifetime Transactions, Counsel Fees Reduced

Lifetime transfer of real property from decedent to son was voided due to lack of donative capacity and undue influence, so son must return proceeds of sale of property to the estate, along with mineral royalties received for the property.  Son who served as agent for mother was also surcharged for the death benefit under a life insurance policy which he improperly cashed in during his mother’s lifetime.  Counsel fees paid by estate reduced by half for portion of services devoted to defending the son as executor.  Knapp Estate, 7 Fid.Rep.3d 170 (Jefferson Co. C.P. 2017).

Stipulated Confidentiality Order Denied

Pettition for approval of stipulated order regarding confidential information to be exchanged by the parties was denied without prejudice when the court was not asked to determine whether documents were confidential and there was no compelling reason to approve the agreement of the parties, the court summarizing the standards for filing documents under seal.  Bauer Trust, John Middleton, Inc. Trust, Frances S. Middleton Trust, 7 Fid.Rep.3d 168 (Montgomery Co. O.C. 2017).

Revocation of Consent to Adoption was not Timely

Father’s attempt to revoke his consent to the adoption of his child, made orally at a hearing more than 30 days after the execution of the consent, was not timely under 23 Pa.C.S. § 2711(c) and was ineffective.  In re: R.L., 2017 PA Super 333 (10/20/2017).

Judgment for “Necessaries” Denied

Judgment will not be entered against surviving spouse for “necessaries” when the creditor did not bring suit against the contracting spouse, did not attempt to obtain letters of administration for the estate of the deceased contracting spouse and did file any claim against the estate, and so cannot show that the estate is insolvent, as required by 23 Pa.C.S. § 4102.  Ridge MD Leasing Co. LLC v. Whittington, 7 Fid.Rep.3d 151 (Franklin Co. C.P. 2017).

No Action against Lawyer and Charity

Action against lawyer to decedent and charitable beneficiary of estate was dismissed because lawyer did not have conflict of interest merely because the lawyer’s partner has represented the charity in other matters and charity was not unjustly enriched.  Estate of Kasych v. Butz, 7 Fid.Rep.3d 139 (Lehigh Co. C.P. 2017).

Surcharge Imposed for Unjustified Payments

Administrator C.T.A. surcharged for disbursements from estate funds for expenses that appear to be for her own personal use, and for amounts paid to the estate of the decedent’s brother and his widow, but not for amounts paid for repairs to be made to a property co-owned with the decedent’s brother, even though the repairs were apparently never made and the administrator was the victim of a scam, or for amounts paid to a possible contestant to the will.  Commissions paid to the administrator of approximately 6% of the gross estate were reduced by one half.  Hunsicker Estate, 7 Fid.Rep.3d 130 (Monroe Co. O.C. 2017).