The American College of Trust and Estates Counsel (ACTEC) has sent comments to the Internal Revenue Service on the proposed regulations for basis reporting by estates.
The Orphans’ Court Procedural Rules Committee has proposed a new O.C. Rule 14.6, and a new form, relating to written depositions in guardianship proceedings.
As the committee report explains, expert testimony in guardianship proceedings is authorized by statute, 20 Pa.C.S. § 5518, but the form for this testimony has varied by county. The proposed form would become a mandatory statewide form to be used by each and every evaluator who is providing testimony by deposition regarding the capacity of an alleged incapacitated person where incapacity is uncontested.
Comments on the new rule and form may be submitted by email to orphanscourtproceduralrules@pacourts.us, or by U.S. Mail to the address provided in the report. Any comments should be submitted by June 20, 2016.
The report also notes that the committee “continues its efforts to develop more comprehensive statewide rules and forms for guardianship proceedings.”
Proposed Adoption of New Pa.O.C. Rule 14.6 and Form G-05, 46 Pa.B. 2306 (5/7/16).
Armstrong County has amended its local Orphans’ Court rules by rescinding local rule 12.16, effective thirty days after publication.
Appeal from probate denied where testamentary capacity was supported by testimony of attorney who prepared will, subscribing witnesses, and other disinterested parties, and no confidential relationship shown to support allegation of undue influence. Lewis Will, 6 Fid.Rep.3d 123 (O.C. Allegheny 2016) (opinion by O’Toole, A.J.), app. quashed, No. 155 WDA 2016 (Pa.Super. 10/11/2016) (non-precedential).
Wife continued to be a co-trustee and beneficiary of the husband’s irrevocable trust even after the divorce of the parties where (a) the trust document made no provision for the possibility of divorce, (b) the irrevocable trust was the beneficiary of a life insurance policy owned by wife’s revocable trust, which was the owner of the cash surrender value of the policy under a split-dollar agreement, (c) the divorce agreement allowed the wife to keep the insurance policy and cash surrender value, and made no mention of the irrevocable trust, and (d) the wife continued to pay insurance premiums following the divorce. Klein Trust, 6 Fid.Rep.3d 118 (O.C. Monroe 2016) (opinion by Williamson, J.)
Nonprofit advocacy organization which was removed as counsel for alleged incapacitated person (“AIP”), but allowed to participate in guardianship proceedings as amicus curae while the AIP was represented by court-appointed counsel, should not have standing to appeal adjudication of incapacity. In re Sabatino, 6 Fid.Rep.3d 101 (O.C. Montgomery 2016) (opinion by Ott, Sr.J.), aff’d on other grounds, No. 3836 EDA 2015 (Pa. Super. 11/30/2016) (non-precedential; organization had standing to appeal, and orders affirmed on the merits, any error being harmless; remanded on issue of allocation of costs of expert testimony).
When residence owned as joint tenants with right of survivorship was destroyed by fire before the death of one tenant, proceeds of property insurance are divided between the estate of the deceased tenant and the surviving tenant. Miscella Estate, 6 Fid.Rep.3d 97 (O.C. Monroe Co. 2016) (opinion by Williamson, J.).
Pennsylvania has enacted a new “Caregiver Advise, Record and Enable Act” (CARE Act), H.B. 1329, Act of April 20, 2016, No. 20, effective in 12 months. This new law attempts to help family members and other “lay caregivers” of people…
Both houses of the Pennsylvania legislature have approved SB 879, the “Pennsylvania ABLE Act” (an unconsolidated statute), which allows the creation of “ABLE” savings accounts intended to qualify under IRC section 529A. (“ABLE” is an acronym for “Achieving a Better Life Experience.”)
Section 529A allows the creation of savings accounts for people with disabilities that act somewhat like the education accounts authorized by section 529, except that it refers to “qualified disability expenses” instead of “qualified education expenses.”
Look for an article on the Pennsylvania ABLE Act and section 529A in the near future.
Update: SB 879 was approved by the Governor on 4/18/2016, becoming Act No. 17 of 2016.
A nephew has no cause of action for “loss of consortium and the los[s] of support, cooperation, aid, companionship and loving interactive relationship” with aunt and uncle alleging resulting from their mistreatment. Scott T. Young v. Estate of Frank J. Young and Norma Young, No. 658 C.D. 2015 (Pa. Cmnwlth. 4/12/16).