The Internal Revenue Service has confirmed that the assets of a trust that is a grantor trust for federal income tax purposes do not get a new income tax basis at the death of the grantor merely because the trust is a grantor trust, but will get a new basis if the grantor has a power over the trust that causes the trust assets to be included in the grantor’s gross estate for federal estate tax purposes. Rev. Rul. 2023-2, 2023-16 I.R.B. 658 (4/17/2023).
The Orphans’ Court has nonmandatory jurisdiction over an ejectment action when there are “entangled” counterclaims that are within the mandatory jurisdiction of the Orphans’ Court, but the proper remedy is not the dismissal of the ejectment action brought in the Civil Division but the transfer of the action to the Orphans’ Court. Estate of Ricky E. Hull v. Melissa S. Showman, 1277 WDA 2022 (Pa. Super. 7/6/2023) (non-precedential).
[DBE Note: A possible problem with this decision is the suggestion that the Orphans’ Court had jurisdiction over the ejectment action only because the defendant asserted counterclaims that were within the mandatory jurisdiction of the Orphans’ Court, so the court had nonmandatory jurisdiction under 20 Pa.C.S. § 712(3) because there were “substantial questions” that were within the mandatory jurisdiction of the court and also matters not within that jurisdiction. However, under 20 Pa.C.S. § 711(a), the mandatory jurisdiction of the court includes “the administration and distribution of the real and personal property of decedents’ estates” and obtaining possession of a decedent’s real property would seem to be necessary in most–if not all–cases if the real property is to be sold.]
Testamentary gifts to step-grandchildren that were conditioned upon their grandmother (the decedent’s wife) not electing against his will and not recovering assets “in our divorce after my death” did not disinherit the step-grandchildren when a final decree of divorce (and equitable division of marital assets) was entered before death because the scrivener of the will testified that it was what the testator intended. In re: Estate of Thomas P. Cassidy, Deceased, 2023 PA Super 101, ___ A.3d. ___ (6/9/2023), rev’g 12 Fid.Rep.3d 423 (Bucks O.C. 2022).
Pa.R.O.C.P. 14.8 has been amended to include more detailed recording of enforcement actions in guardianship reporting. “Order Amending Rule 14.8 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Orphans’ Court Procedure; No. 948 Supreme Court Rules Docket” (6/12/2023), 53 Pa.B. 3305 (6/24/2023), to be effective April 1, 2024.
The executor of a deceased trustee had standing to object to the account filed by the surviving trustee when other beneficiaries joined in the objections and the objection to standing was waived by not raising it until after two and a half years of litigation. Claims for legal fees were properly denied when the trustee was surcharged and the fees were incurred after all pleadings were filed, because a trustee is not entitled to fees for asserting a claim to fees. Cassalia Trusts (No. 2), 1 Fid.Rep.4th 63 (Montgomery O.C. 2023), on appeal, 666 EDA 2023 (Pa. Super.) (consolidated with 667-672 EDA 2023). (The adjudication to which this Pa.R.A.P. 1925(a) opinion relates was Cassalia Trusts, 12 Fid.Rep.3d 562 (Montgomery O.C. 2022).)
Preliminary objections to a petition for the removal of a corporate trustee were sustained, and the petition dismissed, when the corporate trustee refused to make distributions which it “shall deem advisable” for health, maintenance, support, and education without first receiving financial information from the beneficiaries. The petitioners also failed to join the remainder beneficiaries, who were necessary and indispensible parties. Holdship Trust, 1 Fid.Rep.4th 59 (Allegheny O.C. 2022), aff’d, 288 A.3d 919, 2023 PA Super 11 (1/19/2023) (allegations of petition were not grounds for removal).
Will with electronic signature, affixed by the decedent using DocVerify system during a videoconference with two witnesses and a notary public, is not a valid will, which requires an “actual ink to paper” signature. Kittler Estate, 1 Fid.Rep.4th 53 (Lancaster O.C. 2022), aff’d 2023 PA Super 180, ___ A.3d ___ (9/25/2023).
Challenges to the validity of a revocable trust must be made by a petition to the Orphans’ Court, and not by an appeal from the probate of the will of which the trust is a beneficiary, and so the appeal from probate which alleges undue influence, lack of testamentary capacity, and fraud as to the revocable trust and its amendments, and not the will, was dismissed without prejudice. Mode Estate, 1 Fid.Rep.4th 52 (Chester O.C. 2022).
Before marrying his wife, the decedent executed a deed conveying a life estate to the woman who would later become his wife if she survived him, with the remainder passing at her death to “the parties entitled thereto in the said will” if he died with a will. The decedent died with a will that was executed before the marriage, but the remainder was excluded from the estate subject to the wife’s intestate share as pretermitted spouse under 20 Pa.C.S. 2105(a) (as in effect in at the decedent’s death in 1975) because she had joined in the deed. Estate of Evelyn S. Holtry, Deceased v. Sandra K. Myers, et. al., 1 Fid.Rep.4th 43 (Franklin C.D. 2023).
A late spousal election under 20 Pa.C.S. § 2210 by the guardian of an incapacitated spouse will be allowed when the COVID-19 pandemic struck between the date of death and the six month filing deadline, the estate was not harmed by the delay, all parties were aware that the guardian intended to make the election, and inequities and gross injustice would otherwise result. Garbutt Estate, 1 Fid.Rep.4th 29 (Chester O.C. 2022), aff’d In re: Estate of Terri Garbutt, 616 EDA 2022 (Pa. Super. 2/27/2023) (non-precedential). (The Superior Court opinion was previously reported.)